May 31, 2010
---------------------
Monday
>>>Welcome visitor, you're not logged in.
Login   Subscribe Now!
Home User Management About Us Chinese
  Bookmark   Download   Print
Search:  serch "Fabao" Window Font Size: Home PageHome PageHome Page
 
No. 2 of Four Model Cases of Safeguarding the Rights and Interests of Workers in New Forms of Employment Published by the Supreme People's Court: Whether it is "work related to the business (of an enterprise)" as specified in the relevant liability insurance for new forms of employment shall be determined through comprehensive examination in light of the specific insurance claim circumstances, the necessity of the relevant acts for the completion of the business-related work, and other factors — [REDACTED] Catering Delivery Company v. [REDACTED] Insurance Company (Dispute over a Liability Insurance Contract)
最高人民法院发布4起新就业形态劳动者权益保障典型案例之二:某餐饮配送公司诉某保险公司责任保险合同纠纷案——是否属于新就业形态相关责任保险中的“业务有关工作”,应当依据具体理赔情形,结合相关行为对于完成业务工作的必要性等因素综合审查认定
【法宝引证码】
  • Legal document: Judgment
  • Procedural status: Trial at First Instance
 
  
No. 2 of Four Model Cases of Safeguarding the Rights and Interests of Workers in New Forms of Employment Published by the Supreme People's Court: Whether it is "work related to the business (of an enterprise)" as specified in the relevant liability insurance for new forms of employment shall be determined through comprehensive examination in light of the specific insurance claim circumstances, the necessity of the relevant acts for the completion of the business-related work, and other factors 最高人民法院发布4起新就业形态劳动者权益保障典型案例之二:某餐饮配送公司诉某保险公司责任保险合同纠纷案
—[REDACTED] Catering Delivery Company v. [REDACTED] Insurance Company (Dispute over a Liability Insurance Contract) ——是否属于新就业形态相关责任保险中的“业务有关工作”,应当依据具体理赔情形,结合相关行为对于完成业务工作的必要性等因素综合审查认定
Basic Facts 基本案情
[REDACTED] Catering Delivery Company purchased the employer's liability insurance from [REDACTED] Insurance Company. [REDACTED] Catering Delivery Company was the insured, the insurance amount (limit for each person) was 650,000 yuan, the job type of employees was a delivery rider, and Kan [REDACTED] was the only employee. The column of "Special Agreement" in the insurance policy states that this insurance policy includes additional personal third-party liability, i.e., covering direct actual losses including personal casualties or property damages of third parties other than the insured and the insured's employees due to accident or negligence of the employees when they engage in work related to the business of the insured as specified in the insurance policy within the validity period of the insurance policy, with an aggregate limit of 400,000 yuan. Assigned by [REDACTED] Catering Delivery Company, Kan [REDACTED] drove his electric bicycle to the hospital designated by the Company to obtain a health certificate. On the way to the hospital, Kan [REDACTED] collided with Qian [REDACTED] and Qian [REDACTED] was injured. The traffic police department determined that Kan [REDACTED] was fully liable for the accident and Qian [REDACTED] was unaccountable. [REDACTED] Catering Delivery Company filed a claim with [REDACTED] Insurance Company after actually paying Qian [REDACTED] compensation of 71,000 yuan. [REDACTED] Insurance Company held that the traffic accident did not occur on the way of Kan [REDACTED] to deliver food, the obtaining of a health certificate was "work related to the business of the insured," and the compensation liability for the traffic accident was not within the scope of insurance coverage. So, it refused to pay indemnity. [REDACTED] Catering Delivery Company filed a lawsuit with the people's court and requested that the people's court should order [REDACTED] Insurance Company to pay indemnity of 71,000 yuan within the scope of insurance coverage. 某餐饮配送公司向某保险公司投保雇主责任险,被保险人为某餐饮配送公司,保险金额(每人限额)65万元,雇员工种为外卖骑手,雇员1人“阚某”。保单“特别约定”栏载明,本保单附加个人第三者责任:承保对被雇佣人员在本保险单有效期内从事本保险单所载明的被保险人业务有关工作时,由于意外或者疏忽,造成被保险人及其雇员以外的第三者人身伤亡或者财产损失的直接实际损失,保障限额40万元。阚某经某餐饮配送公司指派,驾驶电动自行车前往公司定点医院办理健康证明,途中与钱某发生碰撞,致钱某受伤。交警部门认定阚某负事故全部责任,钱某无责。某餐饮配送公司实际赔偿钱某7.1万元后,向某保险公司申请理赔。某保险公司认为,该交通事故未发生在阚某送餐途中,办理健康证明不属于从事“被保险人业务有关工作”,该交通事故赔偿责任不属于保险责任范围,拒绝赔偿。某餐饮配送公司诉至法院,请求判令某保险公司在保险责任范围内赔偿7.1万元。
...... ......



Dear visitor,you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases . If you are not a subscriber, please subscribe . Should you have any questions, please contact us at:
+86 (10) 8268-9699 or +86 (10) 8266-8266 (ext. 153)
Mobile: +86 133-1157-0713
Fax: +86 (10) 8266-8268
database@chinalawinfo.com


 


您好:您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区,如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户,请注册并交纳相应费用成为我们的英文会员 。如有问题请来电咨询;
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com


     
     
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝www.lawinfochina.com
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code!
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials.
 
Home | Products and Services | FAQ | Disclaimer | Chinese | Site Map
©2012 Chinalawinfo Co., Ltd.    database@chinalawinfo.com  Tel: +86 (10) 8268-9699  京ICP证010230-8