|
|
|
No. 1 of the Five Batch-2 Model Cases of the Supreme People's Court on Serving and Safeguarding FTZ Development: The case of XX Airlines vs. JinX Company over air cargo transportation contract dispute
|
|
最高人民法院发布第二批5个服务保障自由贸易试验区建设典型案例之一：某航空公司与金某公司航空货物运输合同纠纷案
|
|
【法宝引证码】
|
- Legal document：
Ruling
- Procedural status：
Trial at Second Instance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| No. 1 of the Five Batch-2 Model Cases of the Supreme People's Court on Serving and Safeguarding FTZ Development: The case of XX Airlines vs. JinX Company over air cargo transportation contract dispute | | 最高人民法院发布第二批5个服务保障自由贸易试验区建设典型案例之一：某航空公司与金某公司航空货物运输合同纠纷案 |
| Basic facts | | 【基本案情】 |
| In January 2022, XX Airlines and JinX Company signed a Transportation Agreement, in which the two parties agreed that XX Airlines operates flights between Beijing and Los Angeles, JinX Company charters flight and pays fees, the chartered flight price is linked to the fuel price, the Chinese laws shall apply on contract validity, interpretation and performance, and theMontreal Conventionshall apply on the carrier's liability for compensation towards the charterer. The two parties then signed a Supplementary Agreement for price decrease in low seasons and price increase in high seasons. When performing the contract, XX Airlines shipped JinX Company's cargo to Los Angeles as agreed. Occasionally, some cargo was left unloaded or lost due to insufficient space in cargo hold, runway restriction or weather conditions, but the left-over cargo was all transported in the earliest possible flights thereafter. In July 2022, JinX Company stopped to pay the chartering fees on the grounds that the international fuel price hike had made the charter price too expensive, which constituted a tacit condition, and unilaterally terminated the contract. XX Airlines sued JinX Company, claiming the payment of the default fuel surcharges and charter fees and penalties, and JinX Company counterclaimed the return of the deposits and the compensation for the left-over and lost goods. | | 2022年1月，某航空公司与金某公司签订《运输协议》，约定由某航空公司执飞北京至洛杉矶往返航线，金某公司支付包机费用，包机价格与燃油价格实行联动，并约定合同的效力、解释、履行等适用中国法律，承运方对包机方的赔偿责任适用《蒙特利尔公约》。双方又签订《补充协议》，约定淡季价格下调、旺季价格上涨。合同履行中，某航空公司按照约定将金某公司托运的货物运至洛杉矶。少数运单因飞机配载、跑道限制或天气状况等原因出现拉货（指原计划配载的货物未能全部装上飞机）及货物丢失情形。但对于全部拉货，某航空公司已在后续最近航班中运输完毕。2022年7月，金某公司以国际燃油价格暴涨造成包机价格过高构成情势变更为由，停付包机费用，单方中止合同。某航空公司起诉金某公司，请求支付拖欠的燃油费、包机费及违约金。金某公司提起反诉，请求某航空公司返还押金、赔偿拉货和丢货损失。 |
| ．．．．．． | | ．．．．．． |
Dear visitor,you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases . If you are not a subscriber, please subscribe . Should you have any questions, please contact us at:
+86 (10) 8268-9699 or +86 (10) 8266-8266 (ext. 153)
Mobile: +86 133-1157-0713
Fax: +86 (10) 8266-8268
database@chinalawinfo.com
| |
您好：您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区，如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录，进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息；如您还不是我们 的英文用户，请注册并交纳相应费用成为我们的英文会员 。如有问题请来电咨询；
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content
found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright
owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.
Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations
of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language
versions as the final authority. lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly
or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.
We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve
the quality of our materials.
|
|
| |
|
|