May 31, 2010
---------------------
Monday
>>>Welcome visitor, you're not logged in.
Login   Subscribe Now!
Home User Management About Us Chinese
  Bookmark   Download   Print
Search:  serch "Fabao" Window Font Size: Home PageHome PageHome Page
 
No. 1 of the Administrative Model Environmental Resources Cases Tried by the People's Courts in 2019 Published by the Supreme People's Court: Case of Ni Enchun v. Tianjin Ecology and Environment Bureau for failure to perform the environmental protection supervision and administration duties
最高人民法院发布2019年度人民法院环境资源行政典型案例之一:倪恩纯诉天津市生态环境局不履行环境保护监督管理职责案
【法宝引证码】
 
  
No. 1 of the Administrative Model Environmental Resources Cases Tried by the People's Courts in 2019 Published by the Supreme People's Court: Case of Ni Enchun v. Tianjin Ecology and Environment Bureau for failure to perform the environmental protection supervision and administration duties 最高人民法院发布2019年度人民法院环境资源行政典型案例之一:倪恩纯诉天津市生态环境局不履行环境保护监督管理职责案
Basic Facts 基本案情
From 2004, Ni Enchun worked for Bridgestone (Tianjin) Tires Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Bridgestone Company”) at a post with radiation. In 2014, Ni Enchun was diagnosed with multiple myeloma. From February to June 2015, Ni Enchun required the Tianjin Ecology and Environment Bureau to disclose the investigation and daily supervision records of Bridgestone Company's use of PT machines without a radiation safety permit. In April 2015, the Tianjin Ecology and Environment Bureau gave Bridgestone Company a penalty, but there were no routine monitoring records on Bridgestone Company's PT machines from 2004 to the end of 2013. Ni Enchun filed an administrative lawsuit and claimed that the failure of the Tianjin Ecology and Environment Bureau to perform supervision and administration duties against Bridgestone Company was an administrative nonfeasance, which was illegal. 2004年起,倪恩纯在普利司通(天津)轮胎有限公司(以下简称普利司通公司)放射性岗位工作。2014年被诊断为多发性骨髓瘤。2015年2月至6月,倪恩纯要求天津市生态环境局公开对普利司通公司无辐射安全许可证使用PT机的行为进行查处和日常监管记录等相关信息。天津市生态环境局于2015年4月对普利司通公司进行了处罚,但无2004年至2013年底对普利司通公司PT机的日常监查记录。倪恩纯提起行政诉讼,请求确认天津市生态环境局对普利司通公司未尽监督管理职责属行政不作为违法。
Judgment 裁判结果
In the trial of first instance, the Tianjin Railway Transport Court held that as the department approving the EIA documents of Bridgestone Company, the Tianjin Ecology and Environment Bureau had the corresponding supervision and inspection duties. When Bridgestone Company applied for administrative licensing of its report on the environmental impacts of radiation devices in 2009, it should have known that the Company planned to install and use radiation devices. However, it did not inspect Bridgestone Company until Ni Enchun's tip-off in 2015 and it had a careless omission in supervision and administration. The Court entered a judgment of first instance and confirmed that the failure of the Tianjin Ecology and Environment Bureau to perform the statutory supervision and administration duties on the safety and protection of radiation devices of Bridgestone Company from 2009 to the end of 2013 was illegal. In the trial of second instance, the No. 4 Intermediate People's Court of Beijing Municipality affirmed the original judgment. 天津铁路运输法院一审认为,天津市生态环境局作为普利司通公司环境影响评价文件的审批部门,具有相应的监督检查职责,其在2009年普利司通公司申请射线装置环境影响报告的行政许可时,即应知道该企业有安装使用射线装置的计划,但直至2015年因倪恩纯举报才对普利司通公司进行检查,在监督管理上存在疏漏。一审判决,确认天津市生态环境局自2009年至2013年底未对普利司通公司射线装置的安全和防护工作履行法定监督管理职责的行为违法。北京市第四中级人民法院二审维持原判。
...... ......



Dear visitor,you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases . If you are not a subscriber, please subscribe . You can purchase a single article through Online Pay to immediately view and download this document. Should you have any questions, please contact us at:
+86 (10) 8268-9699 or +86 (10) 8266-8266 (ext. 153)
Mobile: +86 133-1157-0712
Fax: +86 (10) 8266-8268
database@chinalawinfo.com


 


您好:您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区,如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户,请注册并交纳相应费用成为我们的英文会员 ;您也可通过网上支付进行单篇购买,支付成功后即可立即查看本篇案例 。如有问题请来电咨询;
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570712
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com


     
     
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝www.lawinfochina.com
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code!
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials.
 
Home | Products and Services | FAQ | Disclaimer | Chinese | Site Map
©2012 Chinalawinfo Co., Ltd.    database@chinalawinfo.com  Tel: +86 (10) 8268-9699  京ICP证010230-8