May 31, 2010
---------------------
Monday
>>>Welcome visitor, you're not logged in.
Login   Subscribe Now!
Home User Management About Us Chinese
  Bookmark   Download   Print
Search:  serch "Fabao" Window Font Size: Home PageHome PageHome Page
 
No. 1 of the Administrative Model Environmental Resources Cases Tried by the People's Courts in 2019 Published by the Supreme People's Court: Case of Ni Enchun v. Tianjin Ecology and Environment Bureau for failure to perform the environmental protection supervision and administration duties
最高人民法院发布2019年度人民法院环境资源行政典型案例之一:倪恩纯诉天津市生态环境局不履行环境保护监督管理职责案
【法宝引证码】
 
  
No. 1 of the Administrative Model Environmental Resources Cases Tried by the People's Courts in 2019 Published by the Supreme People's Court: Case of Ni Enchun v. Tianjin Ecology and Environment Bureau for failure to perform the environmental protection supervision and administration duties 最高人民法院发布2019年度人民法院环境资源行政典型案例之一:倪恩纯诉天津市生态环境局不履行环境保护监督管理职责案
1. Basic Facts (一)基本案情
From 2004, Ni Enchun worked for Bridgestone (Tianjin) Tires Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Bridgestone Company”) at a post with radiation. In 2014, Ni Enchun was diagnosed with multiple myeloma. From February to June 2015, Ni Enchun required the Tianjin Ecology and Environment Bureau to disclose the investigation and daily supervision records of Bridgestone Company's use of PT machines without a radiation safety permit. In April 2015, the Tianjin Ecology and Environment Bureau gave Bridgestone Company a penalty, but there were no routine monitoring records on Bridgestone Company's PT machines from 2004 to the end of 2013. Ni Enchun filed an administrative lawsuit and claimed that the failure of the Tianjin Ecology and Environment Bureau to perform supervision and administration duties against Bridgestone Company was an administrative nonfeasance, which was illegal. 2004年起,倪恩纯在普利司通(天津)轮胎有限公司(以下简称普利司通公司)放射性岗位工作。2014年被诊断为多发性骨髓瘤。2015年2月至6月,倪恩纯要求天津市生态环境局公开对普利司通公司无辐射安全许可证使用PT机的行为进行查处和日常监管记录等相关信息。天津市生态环境局于2015年4月对普利司通公司进行了处罚,但无2004年至2013年底对普利司通公司PT机的日常监查记录。倪恩纯提起行政诉讼,请求确认天津市生态环境局对普利司通公司未尽监督管理职责属行政不作为违法。
2. Judgment (二)裁判结果
...... ......



Dear visitor,you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases . If you are not a subscriber, please subscribe . Should you have any questions, please contact us at:
+86 (10) 8268-9699 or +86 (10) 8266-8266 (ext. 153)
Mobile: +86 133-1157-0713
Fax: +86 (10) 8266-8268
database@chinalawinfo.com


 


您好:您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区,如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户,请注册并交纳相应费用成为我们的英文会员 。如有问题请来电咨询;
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com


     
     
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝www.lawinfochina.com
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code!
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials.
 
Home | Products and Services | FAQ | Disclaimer | Chinese | Site Map
©2012 Chinalawinfo Co., Ltd.    database@chinalawinfo.com  Tel: +86 (10) 8268-9699  京ICP证010230-8