May 31, 2010
---------------------
Monday
>>>Welcome visitor, you're not logged in.
Login   Subscribe Now!
Home User Management About Us Chinese
  Bookmark   Download   Print
Search:  serch "Fabao" Window Font Size: Home PageHome PageHome Page
 
Guiding Case No. 115 of the Supreme People's Court:Valeo Systemes d'Essuyage v. Xiamen Lukasi Automobile Parts Co., Ltd. Et al. (Dispute over infringement upon an invention patent)
指导案例115号:瓦莱奥清洗系统公司诉厦门卢卡斯汽车配件有限公司等侵害发明专利权纠纷案
【法宝引证码】
 
  
Guiding Case No. 115 of the Supreme People's Court: Valeo Systemes d'Essuyage v. Xiamen Lukasi Automobile Parts Co., Ltd. Et al. (Dispute over infringement upon an invention patent) 指导案例115号:瓦莱奥清洗系统公司诉厦门卢卡斯汽车配件有限公司等侵害发明专利权纠纷案
Guiding Case No. 115 (最高人民法院审判委员会讨论通过 2019年12月24日发布)
(Issued on December 24, 2019, as deliberated and adopted by the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court) 指导案例115号
Keywords: 关键词
civil; invention patent; functional features; interlocutory judgment; injunction 民事/发明专利权/功能性特征/先行判决/行为保全
Key Points of Judgment 裁判要点
1. Where a technical feature in the claim of a patent has defined or implied the specific structure, components, steps, conditions, or relations between them, even if the technical feature also defines the function or effect that it realizes, the technical feature is not the functional feature as mentioned in Article 8 of the Interpretation (II) of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Patent Infringement Dispute Cases. 1.如果专利权利要求的某个技术特征已经限定或者隐含了特定结构、组分、步骤、条件或其相互之间的关系等,即使该技术特征同时还限定了其所实现的功能或者效果,亦不属于《最高人民法院关于审理侵犯专利权纠纷案件应用法律若干问题的解释(二)》第八条所称的功能性特征。
2. In a judicial proceeding for patent infringement, an injunction ordering the cessation of the alleged patent infringement has independent values. Where a party has applied for both an injunction ordering cessation of the alleged infringement and an interlocutory judgment on cessation of infringement, and the people's court deems it necessary to enter an interlocutory judgment on cessation of infringement, the people's court should concurrently examine the application for an injunction; and if the conditions for an injunction are met, should enter a ruling in a timely manner. 2.在专利侵权诉讼程序中,责令停止被诉侵权行为的行为保全具有独立价值。当事人既申请责令停止被诉侵权行为,又申请先行判决停止侵害,人民法院认为需要作出停止侵害先行判决的,应当同时对行为保全申请予以审查;符合行为保全条件的,应当及时作出裁定。
Legal Provisions 相关法条
1. Article 59 of the Patent Law of the People's Republic of China 1.《中华人民共和国专利法》第59条
2.Article 153 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China 2.《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第153条
Basic Facts 基本案情
In 2016, Valeo Systemes d'Essuyage (hereinafter referred to as “Valeo”), as the patentee of the invention involved, “wiper connectors for motor vehicles and corresponding connecting devices,” with the patent still being in the protection period, filed a lawsuit with the Shanghai Intellectual Property Court, alleging that the wiper products manufactured, sold, and offered for sale by Xiamen Lukasi Automobile Parts Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Lukasi Company”) and Xiamen Fuke Automobile Parts Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Fuke Company”) without permission and those manufactured and sold by Chen Shaoqiang without permission fell within the protection scope of its patent. Valeo requested the court to order Lukasi Company, Fuke Company, and Chen Shaoqiang to cease infringement and compensate the plaintiff for losses and reasonable expenses on stopping the infringement in a temporary amount of 6 million yuan, and also requested the court to enter an interlocutory judgment ordering Lukasi Company, Fuke Company, and Chen Shaoqiang to immediately cease infringement upon the patent involved. In addition, Valeo applied for an interim injunction, requesting the court to rule that Lukasi Company, Fuke Company, and Chen Shaoqiang should immediately cease the infringement. 瓦莱奥清洗系统公司(以下简称瓦莱奥公司)是涉案“机动车辆的刮水器的连接器及相应的连接装置”发明专利的专利权人,该专利仍在保护期内。瓦莱奥公司于2016年向上海知识产权法院提起诉讼称,厦门卢卡斯汽车配件有限公司(以下简称卢卡斯公司)、厦门富可汽车配件有限公司(以下简称富可公司)未经许可制造、销售、许诺销售,陈少强未经许可制造、销售的雨刮器产品落入其专利权保护范围。瓦莱奥公司请求判令卢卡斯公司、富可公司和陈少强停止侵权,赔偿损失及制止侵权的合理开支暂计600万元,并请求人民法院先行判决卢卡斯公司、富可公司和陈少强立即停止侵害涉案专利权的行为。此外,瓦莱奥公司还提出了临时行为保全申请,请求法院裁定卢卡斯公司、富可公司、陈少强立即停止侵权行为。
...... ......



Dear visitor,you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases . If you are not a subscriber, please subscribe . Should you have any questions, please contact us at:
+86 (10) 8268-9699 or +86 (10) 8266-8266 (ext. 153)
Mobile: +86 133-1157-0713
Fax: +86 (10) 8266-8268
database@chinalawinfo.com


 


您好:您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区,如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户,请注册并交纳相应费用成为我们的英文会员 。如有问题请来电咨询;
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com


     
     
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝www.lawinfochina.com
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code!
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials.
 
Home | Products and Services | FAQ | Disclaimer | Chinese | Site Map
©2012 Chinalawinfo Co., Ltd.    database@chinalawinfo.com  Tel: +86 (10) 8268-9699  京ICP证010230-8