May 31, 2010
---------------------
Monday
>>>Welcome visitor, you're not logged in.
Login   Subscribe Now!
Home User Management About Us Chinese
  Bookmark   Download   Print
Search:  serch "Fabao" Window Font Size: Home PageHome PageHome Page
 
No. 3 of Ten Model Cases Involving Intellectual Property Rights in Technology in 2020 of the Intellectual Property Tribunal of the Supreme People's Court and No. 1 of Six Model Intellectual Property Infringement Civil Cases Published by the Supreme People's Court to Which Punitive Damages Apply: I. Guangzhou Tianci Company and Others v. Anhui Newman Company and Others (Case of dispute over technical secret infringement)
最高人民法院知识产权法庭2020年10件技术类知识产权典型案例之三、最高人民法院发布六起侵害知识产权民事案件适用惩罚性赔偿典型案例之一:广州天赐公司等与华某等侵害技术秘密纠纷案——“卡波”技术秘密惩罚性赔偿案
【法宝引证码】
  • Legal document: Judgment
  • Procedural status: Trial at Second Instance
 
  
No. 3 of Ten Model Cases Involving Intellectual Property Rights in Technology in 2020 of the Intellectual Property Tribunal of the Supreme People's Court and No. 1 of Six Model Intellectual Property Infringement Civil Cases Published by the Supreme People's Court to Which Punitive Damages Apply: I. Guangzhou Tianci Company and Others v. Anhui Newman Company and Others (Case of dispute over technical secret infringement) 最高人民法院知识产权法庭2020年10件技术类知识产权典型案例之三、最高人民法院发布六起侵害知识产权民事案件适用惩罚性赔偿典型案例之一:广州天赐公司等与华某等侵害技术秘密纠纷案——“卡波”技术秘密惩罚性赔偿案
[Case No.] [No. 562 [2019], Final, Civil Division, IP, SPC] 【案号】(2019)最高法知民终562号
[Basic case facts] Guangzhou Tianci Company and Jiujiang Tianci Company claimed that Hua X, Liu X, Anhui Newman Company, Wu XX, Hu XX, Zhu XX, and Peng X infringed upon their technical secret of “Kabo” manufacturing process, and filed a lawsuit with the Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court, requesting it to order the cessation of infringement, compensation for losses, and apology. Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court determined that the alleged infringement constituted the infringement upon the technical secret involved in the case, and adopted 2.5 times the punitive damages in consideration of the infringement intent and circumstances. Guangzhou Tianci Company, Jiujiang Tianci Company, Anhui Newman Company, Hua X and Liu X filed an appeal with the Supreme People's Court against the first-instance judgment. The Supreme People's Court held in the trial of second instance that the alleged infringement constituted the infringement upon the technical secret involved in the case, but the contribution of the technical secret involved in the case was not taken into full consideration when the amount of compensation for the infringement was determined in the first-instance judgment, and punitive damages were determined without sufficient consideration of the degree of the infringer's subjective malice and serious circumstances such as taking infringement as the business, large scale of infringement, long duration of infringement, and the existence of obstruction of proof. Therefore, the Supreme People's Court upheld the first-instance judgment on the cessation of infringement, calculated the punitive damages at the maximum amount of five times the base, and changed the original judgment and ruled that Anhui Newman Company should compensate Guangzhou Tianci Company and Jiujiang Tianci Company for their economic losses of 30 million yuan and reasonable expenses of 400,000 yuan, and Hua X, Liu X, Hu XX, and Zhu XX should assume joint and several liability for the aforesaid amount of compensation to the extent of five million yuan, 30 million yuan, one million yuan and one million yuan respectively. 基本案情】广州天赐公司、九江天赐公司主张华某、刘某、安徽纽曼公司、吴某某、胡某某、朱某某、彭某侵害其“卡波”制造工艺技术秘密,向广州知识产权法院提起诉讼,请求判令停止侵权、赔偿损失、赔礼道歉。广州知识产权法院认定被诉侵权行为构成对涉案技术秘密的侵害,考虑侵权故意和侵权情节,适用了2.5倍的惩罚性赔偿。广州天赐公司、九江天赐公司和安徽纽曼公司、华某、刘某均不服一审判决,向最高人民法院提起上诉。最高人民法院知识产权法庭二审认为,被诉侵权行为构成对涉案技术秘密的侵害,但一审判决在确定侵权赔偿数额时未充分考虑涉案技术秘密的贡献程度,确定惩罚性赔偿时未充分考虑侵权行为人的主观恶意程度和举证妨碍行为等,遂在维持一审判决关于停止侵权判项基础上,以顶格5倍计算适用惩罚性赔偿,改判安徽纽曼公司赔偿广州天赐公司、九江天赐公司经济损失3000万元及合理开支40万元,华某、刘某、胡某某、朱某某对前述赔偿数额分别在500万元、3000万元、100万元、100万元范围内承担连带责任。
...... ......



Dear visitor,you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases . If you are not a subscriber, please subscribe . Should you have any questions, please contact us at:
+86 (10) 8268-9699 or +86 (10) 8266-8266 (ext. 153)
Mobile: +86 133-1157-0713
Fax: +86 (10) 8266-8268
database@chinalawinfo.com


 


您好:您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区,如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户,请注册并交纳相应费用成为我们的英文会员 。如有问题请来电咨询;
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com


     
     
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝www.lawinfochina.com
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code!
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials.
 
Home | Products and Services | FAQ | Disclaimer | Chinese | Site Map
©2012 Chinalawinfo Co., Ltd.    database@chinalawinfo.com  Tel: +86 (10) 8268-9699  京ICP证010230-8