|
Xishanxiaoe Grocery in Xinluo District, Longyan City v. Guangdong Winsing Company Limited (retrial application regarding dispute over trademark infringement)
|
|
龙岩市新罗区西山笑娥食杂店与广东咏声动漫股份有限公司侵害商标权纠纷申请再审案
|
|
【法宝引证码】
|
|
|
|
*尊敬的用户，您好！本篇仅为该案例的英文摘要。北大法宝提供单独的翻译服务，如需整篇翻译，请发邮件至database@chinalawinfo.com，或致电86
(10) 8268-9699进行咨询。
*Dear user, this document contains only a summary of the
respective judicial case. To request a full-text translation as an additional service,
please contact us at: + 86 (10) 8268-9699 database@chinalawinfo.com
|
|
|
|
Xishanxiaoe Grocery in Xinluo District, Longyan City v. Guangdong Winsing Company Limited (retrial application regarding dispute over trademark infringement)
(retrial application regarding dispute over trademark infringement)
龙岩市新罗区西山笑娥食杂店与广东咏声动漫股份有限公司侵害商标权纠纷申请再审案
|
|
[Key Terms]
evidence effect ; trademark infringement ; burden of proof ; notary instrument
[核心术语]
证据效力；商标侵权；证明责任；公证文书
|
|
[Disputed Issues]
The people's court can determine the infringement according to the notary instrument if the infringer in dispute fails to produce evidence to overturn the instrument.
[争议焦点]
被诉侵权人未提交证据推翻公证文书中的内容，法院依据公证文书认定其构成侵权并无不当。
|
|
[Case Summary]
The legal facts and instruments notarized and verified according to statutory procedures should be used as the basis for ascertaining the facts unless there is contrary evidence sufficient enough to overturn the notarial certification. In a trademark infringement dispute if the patentee presents a legally verified notary instrument to prove that the alleged infringer sells the infringing products in dispute...
[案例要旨]
经过法定程序公证证明的法律事实和文书人民法院应当作为认定事实的根据但有相反证据足以推翻公证证明的除外。在商标侵权纠纷中权利人提交经过法定程序公证证明的公证文书...
|
Full-text omitted. | | 龙岩市新罗区西山笑娥食杂店与广东咏声动漫股份有限公司侵害商标权纠纷申请再审案中华人民共和国最高人民法院 |
| | 民事裁定书 |
| | (2021)最高法民申7825号 |
| | 再审申请人(一审被告、二审上诉人)：龙岩市新罗区西山笑娥食杂店。经营场所：福建省龙岩市新罗区西山羊古墩。 |
| | 经营者:章笑娥。 |
| | 委托诉讼代理人:林菁。 |
| | 被申请人(一审原告、二审被上诉人)：广东咏声动漫股份有限公司。 |
| | 法定代表人:古志斌,该公司董事长。 |
| | 再审申请人龙岩市新罗区西山笑娥食杂店(以下简称笑娥食杂店)因与被申请人广东咏声动漫股份有限公司(以下简称咏声动漫公司)侵害商标权纠纷一案，不服福建省高级人民法院(2021)闽民终178号民事判决，向本院申请再审。本院依法组成合议庭进行了审查，现已审查终结。 |
| | 笑娥食杂店向本院申请再审称：原审法院认定事实不清。涉案公证书内容不真实,不能证明侵权事实。1.公证书未载明所购何种商品，无法证明申请人销售被诉侵权产品。2.涉案公证书内有二维码门牌,笑娥食杂店当时并未有二维码门牌,涉案公证书公证内容与事实不符,公证处与咏声动漫公司为自身利益串通坑害笑娥食杂店。3.涉案公证书公证的玩具不是笑娥食杂店的。4.公证程序不合法，公证机构无权受理该项公证。综上，笑娥食杂店依据《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第二百零七条的规定申请再审，请求：1.依法撤销二审判决；2.改判驳回被申请人全部诉讼请求。 |
| | 本院认为，根据申请人申请再审的理由，本案再审审查的焦点问题为：原审判决认定的基本事实是否缺乏证据证明。 |
| | ．．．．．． |
Dear visitor,you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases . If you are not a subscriber, please subscribe . Should you have any questions, please contact us at:
+86 (10) 8268-9699 or +86 (10) 8266-8266 (ext. 153)
Mobile: +86 133-1157-0713
Fax: +86 (10) 8266-8268
database@chinalawinfo.com
| |
您好：您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区，如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录，进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息；如您还不是我们 的英文用户，请注册并交纳相应费用成为我们的英文会员 。如有问题请来电咨询；
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content
found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright
owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.
Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations
of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language
versions as the final authority. lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly
or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.
We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve
the quality of our materials.
|
|