|
|
|
Case No. 5 of Model Maritime Trial Cases across the Country in 2019 Published by the Supreme People's Court: Haining Fuxing Plastics Co., Ltd. v. Ningbo Dayuan International Freight Forwarding Co., Ltd., Shunxiang Shipping Agency (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., and Pacific International Lines (UK) Co., Ltd. (dispute over a contract for the transport of cargoes by sea)
|
|
最高人民法院发布2019年全国海事审判典型案例之五：海宁富兴塑胶有限公司诉宁波达源国际货运代理有限公司、顺翔船务代理（深圳）有限公司、太平船务（英国）有限公司海上货物运输合同纠纷案
|
|
【法宝引证码】
|
- Type of Dispute:
Civil--＞Maritime
- Legal document：
Judgment
- Procedural status：
Trial at Second Instance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Case No. 5 of Model Maritime Trial Cases across the Country in 2019 Published by the Supreme People's Court: Haining Fuxing Plastics Co., Ltd. v. Ningbo Dayuan International Freight Forwarding Co., Ltd., Shunxiang Shipping Agency (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., and Pacific International Lines (UK) Co., Ltd. (dispute over a contract for the transport of cargoes by sea) | | 最高人民法院发布2019年全国海事审判典型案例之五：海宁富兴塑胶有限公司诉宁波达源国际货运代理有限公司、顺翔船务代理（深圳）有限公司、太平船务（英国）有限公司海上货物运输合同纠纷案 |
| [Basic Facts] | | 【基本案情】 |
| There has been a long-term freight forwarding relationship between Haining Fuxing Plastics Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Fuxing Company”) and Ningbo Dayuan International Freight Forwarding Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Dayuan Company”). In February 2018, Fuxing Company entrusted Dayuan Company with booking cargo space to the carrier for the cargoes involved to be exported to Brazil. Shunxiang Shipping Agency (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Shunxiang Company”) accepted the cargo space booking by Dayuan Company as a non-vessel owning common carrier (NVOCC). On March 28 of the same year, Shunxiang Company issued NVOCC bill of lading and delivered it to Fuxing Company through Dayuan Company. On the same day, Pacific International Lines (UK) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Pacific Company”) issued a marine bill of lading and delivered it to Shunxiang Company. On May 3, 2018, after the cargoes involved were unloaded from the ship, they were controlled by the customs office at the Port Navigentes in Brazil and blocked by the Federal Tax Office of Brazil. On May 8, 2018, they were taken delivery by others. The full set of NOVCC bill of lading involved was still held by Fuxing Company and the full set of marine bill of lading was still held by Shunxiang Company. | | 海宁富兴塑胶有限公司（以下简称富兴公司）与宁波达源国际货运代理有限公司（以下简称达源公司）之间存在长期货运代理关系。2018年2月，富兴公司因案涉出口巴西的货物委托达源公司向承运人订舱。顺翔船务代理（深圳）有限公司（以下简称顺翔公司）作为无船承运人接受达源公司订舱，于同年3月28日签发无船承运人提单，并通过达源公司交给富兴公司。太平船务（英国）有限公司（以下简称太平公司）于同日签发海运提单，交由顺翔公司。2018年5月3日，案涉货物卸离船舶由巴西纳维根特斯港海关控制，由巴西联邦税务局封锁，并于2018年5月8日被他人提取。案涉全套无船承运人提单仍由富兴公司持有，案涉全套海运提单仍由顺翔公司持有。 |
| ．．．．．． | | 【裁判结果】 |
| | 宁波海事法院一审法院认为，本案海上货物运输目的港为巴西纳维根特斯，根据目的港法律，承运人须向当地码头交付货物，顺翔公司对此已提供了相应证据，该事实也为我国法院多起案件所证明。根据《最高人民法院关于审理无正本提单交付货物案件适用法律若干问题的规定》（以下简称无单放货司法解释）第七条“承运人依照提单载明的卸货港所在地法律规定，必须将承运到港的货物交付给当地海关或者港口当局的，不承担无正本提单交付货物的民事责任”，承运人不承担无单放货的责任。综上，富兴公司未能证明案涉货物被放行系承运人向巴西海关提供了协助，即不能证明承运人存在过错，其向承运人主张赔偿没有依据。判决驳回富兴公司的诉讼请求。 |
| | ．．．．．． |
Dear visitor,you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases . If you are not a subscriber, please subscribe . Should you have any questions, please contact us at:
+86 (10) 8268-9699 or +86 (10) 8266-8266 (ext. 153)
Mobile: +86 133-1157-0713
Fax: +86 (10) 8266-8268
database@chinalawinfo.com
| |
您好：您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区，如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录，进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息；如您还不是我们 的英文用户，请注册并交纳相应费用成为我们的英文会员 。如有问题请来电咨询；
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content
found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright
owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.
Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations
of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language
versions as the final authority. lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly
or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.
We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve
the quality of our materials.
|
|
| |
|
|