|
Wenhai Printing Factory of Fengxi New Town, Xixian New Area v. Xi'an Tangdu Paper Product Co., Ltd. (retrial case of dispute over trademark infringement and unfair competition)
|
|
西咸新区沣西新城文海印刷厂与西安唐都纸品有限责任公司侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷申请再审案
|
|
【法宝引证码】
|
|
|
|
*尊敬的用户，您好！本篇仅为该案例的英文摘要。北大法宝提供单独的翻译服务，如需整篇翻译，请发邮件至database@chinalawinfo.com，或致电86
(10) 8268-9699进行咨询。
*Dear user, this document contains only a summary of the
respective judicial case. To request a full-text translation as an additional service,
please contact us at: + 86 (10) 8268-9699 database@chinalawinfo.com
|
|
|
|
Wenhai Printing Factory of Fengxi New Town, Xixian New Area v. Xi'an Tangdu Paper Product Co., Ltd. (retrial case of dispute over trademark infringement and unfair competition)
(retrial case of dispute over trademark infringement and unfair competition)
西咸新区沣西新城文海印刷厂与西安唐都纸品有限责任公司侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷申请再审案
|
|
[Key Terms]
unfair competition ; confusion ; mark
[核心术语]
不正当竞争；混淆行为；标识
|
|
[Disputed Issues]
Unfair competition is not constituted if there is no evidence proving that the mark is influential enough to mislead others.
[争议焦点]
没有证据证明标识具有一定影响并足以引人误认的，不构成不正当竞争。
|
|
[Case Summary]
A business operator should not commit confusing acts that mislead the public into believing that their goods are others' or that there is a specific association between their goods and others'. In legal practice a party claims that the business operator commits unfair competition by using the infringing mark in dispute but fails to produce evidence to prove that the infringing mark has a certain reputation. Further the operator clearly marks the producer on the infringing product...
[案例要旨]
经营者不得实施混淆行为使人误认为是他人商品或与他人存在特定联系。实践中他人主张经营者使用被诉侵权标识的行为构成不正当竞争但提供的证据不足以证明被诉侵权标识具有一定影响；且经营者在被诉侵权产品上明确标注制造商...
|
Full-text omitted. | | 西咸新区沣西新城文海印刷厂与西安唐都纸品有限责任公司侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷申请再审案中华人民共和国最高人民法院 |
| | 民事裁定书 |
| | (2021)最高法民申3148号 |
| | 再审申请人(一审原告、二审上诉人):西咸新区沣西新城文海印刷厂。经营场所：陕西省西咸新区沣西新城世纪大道西段段家堡。 |
| | 经营者：马京海，该厂厂长。 |
| | 委托诉讼代理人：黄振东，陕西永嘉信律师事务所律师。 |
| | 委托诉讼代理人：李晓丹，陕西永嘉信律师事务所律师。 |
| | 被申请人(一审被告、二审被上诉人):西安唐都纸品有限责任公司。 |
| | 法定代表人：姚利君，该公司执行董事兼总经理。 |
| | 再审申请人西咸新区沣西新城文海印刷厂(以下简称文海印刷厂)因与被申请人西安唐都纸品有限责任公司(以下简称唐都公司)侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷一案，不服陕西省高级人民法院(2020)陕民终250号民事判决，向本院申请再审。本院依法组成合议庭进行了审查，现已审查终结。 |
| | 文海印刷厂向本院申请再审称，(一)原审判决认定事实错误，没有基本的证据支撑。原审判决依据的《西安市工商局行政管理局行政复议决定书》已在西安铁路运输法院(2018)陕7102行初1210号判决书中被撤销，该证据已失效。文海印刷厂从1989年开始使用“文海”字号。(二)原审法院以商标专用权的思维审理不正当竞争案件，且在判决中引用《中华人民共和国反垄断法》，适用法律错误，影响案件正确判决。(三)文海印刷厂“文海”标识属于《中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法》(以下简称反不正当竞争法)第六条规定的“有一定影响的商品名称和字号”，唐都公司突出使用“文海”标识，主观恶意明显，其行为构成不正当竞争。请求本院依法改判。 |
| | ．．．．．． |
Dear visitor,you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases . If you are not a subscriber, please subscribe . Should you have any questions, please contact us at:
+86 (10) 8268-9699 or +86 (10) 8266-8266 (ext. 153)
Mobile: +86 133-1157-0713
Fax: +86 (10) 8266-8268
database@chinalawinfo.com
| |
您好：您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区，如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录，进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息；如您还不是我们 的英文用户，请注册并交纳相应费用成为我们的英文会员 。如有问题请来电咨询；
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content
found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright
owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.
Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations
of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language
versions as the final authority. lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly
or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.
We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve
the quality of our materials.
|
|