|
No. 2 of Three Model Cases of Crackdown on Counterfeit and Inferior Farm Supplies in 2023 Published by the Supreme People's Court: People v. Liu [REDACTED], et al (case involving the sale of inferior fertilizers)—Sale of inferior fertilizers causing farmers to suffer heavy losses
|
最高人民法院发布三件2023年“农资打假”典型案例之二:刘某等人销售伪劣化肥案——销售伪劣化肥使农户遭受重大损失
|
【法宝引证码】
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. 2 of Three Model Cases of Crackdown on Counterfeit and Inferior Farm Supplies in 2023 Published by the Supreme People's Court: People v. Liu [REDACTED], et al (case involving the sale of inferior fertilizers)—Sale of inferior fertilizers causing farmers to suffer heavy losses | | 最高人民法院发布三件2023年“农资打假”典型案例之二:刘某等人销售伪劣化肥案——销售伪劣化肥使农户遭受重大损失 |
Facts | | 简要案情 |
From March to April 2019, Defendant Ding [REDACTED] asked Defendant Yue [REDACTED] to help buy inexpensive diammonium phosphate fertilizer. After that, Yue [REDACTED] contacted Defendant Liu [REDACTED] to arrange for delivery, and Liu [REDACTED] purchased 130 tons of diammonium phosphate fertilizer under the brand SINO-AGRI from Linyi City, Shandong Province for 1,600 yuan per ton through others, and resold it to Yue [REDACTED] for 1,950 yuan per ton. Yue [REDACTED] resold it to Ding [REDACTED] for 2,500 yuan per ton. After receiving the fertilizer, Ding [REDACTED] sold it to 37 farmers, including Wang [REDACTED] and Zhao [REDACTED], victims of 859 Farm, for 3,050 yuan per ton, with a total sales of more than 390,000 yuan. In this process, Liu [REDACTED], Yue [REDACTED], and Ding [REDACTED] failed to inspect the manufacturer, business qualification, and product quality of the 130-ton of diammonium phosphate fertilizer under the brand SINO-AGRI, leading Wang [REDACTED] and other farmers to suffer from losses of more than 450,000 yuan. After identification, the fertilizer involved is counterfeit and inferior. | | 2019年3月至4月,被告人丁某让被告人岳某帮其联系购买便宜的磷酸二铵化肥。之后,岳某联系被告人刘某发货,刘某通过他人以每吨1600元的价格从山东省临沂市购进130吨“中国农资”牌磷酸二铵化肥,并以每吨1950元的价格转售给岳某。岳某又以每吨2500元的价格转售给丁某,丁某收到化肥后以每吨3050元的价格销售给八五九农场被害人王某、赵某等37名农户,共计销售39万余元。在此过程中,刘某、岳某、丁某均未对该130吨“中国农资”牌磷酸二铵化肥的生产厂家、经营资质、产品质量等证照进行查验,造成王某等农户生产损失45万余元。经鉴定,该涉案化肥为假冒伪劣化肥。 |
...... | | ...... |
Dear visitor,you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases . If you are not a subscriber, please subscribe . Should you have any questions, please contact us at: +86 (10) 8268-9699 or +86 (10) 8266-8266 (ext. 153) Mobile: +86 133-1157-0713 Fax: +86 (10) 8266-8268 database@chinalawinfo.com
| |
您好:您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区,如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户,请注册并交纳相应费用成为我们的英文会员 。如有问题请来电咨询; Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153 Mobile: +86 13311570713 Fax: +86 (10) 82668268 E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com
|
| | | | | |
|
|
|
|
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content
found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright
owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.
Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations
of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language
versions as the final authority. lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly
or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.
We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve
the quality of our materials.
|
|
| |
|
|