|
Zhu Xianhua v. Donghai County Tuguo Jewelry Store, et al. (jurisdictional ruling for civil designated jurisdiction of online shopping contract)
|
|
朱先华、东海县途果珠宝商行等网络购物合同纠纷民事指定管辖管辖裁定书
|
|
【法宝引证码】
|
|
|
|
*尊敬的用户，您好！本篇仅为该案例的英文摘要。北大法宝提供单独的翻译服务，如需整篇翻译，请发邮件至database@chinalawinfo.com，或致电86
(10) 8268-9699进行咨询。
*Dear user, this document contains only a summary of the
respective judicial case. To request a full-text translation as an additional service,
please contact us at: + 86 (10) 8268-9699 database@chinalawinfo.com
|
|
|
|
Zhu Xianhua v. Donghai County Tuguo Jewelry Store, et al. (jurisdictional ruling for civil designated jurisdiction of online shopping contract)
(jurisdictional ruling for civil designated jurisdiction of online shopping contract)
朱先华、东海县途果珠宝商行等网络购物合同纠纷民事指定管辖管辖裁定书
|
|
[Key Terms]
dispute over an online shopping contract ; designated jurisdiction ; statutory jurisdiction
[核心术语]
信息网络买卖合同纠纷；协议管辖；法定管辖
|
|
[Disputed Issues]
The place of jurisdiction should be determined according to the rules for statutory jurisdiction when the rules for designated jurisdiction are invalid.
[争议焦点]
协议管辖条款无效时，应依据法定管辖规则确定管辖地。
|
|
[Case Summary]
For a sales contract concluded through information network where the subject matter is delivered by other means the place of receipt shall be deemed the place where the contract is performed. In legal practice...
[案例要旨]
以信息网络方式订立的买卖合同通过其他方式交付标的的收货地为合同履行地。实践中...
|
Full-text omitted. | | 朱先华、东海县途果珠宝商行等网络购物合同纠纷民事指定管辖管辖裁定书 |
| | 中华人民共和国最高人民法院 |
| | 民事裁定书 |
| | (2023)最高法民辖69号 |
| | 原告：朱先华。 |
| | 被告：东海县途果珠宝商行，经营场所江苏省连云港市东海县牛山街道和平西路177号商贸大世界83-67号商铺。 |
| | 经营者：葛大伟。 |
| | 被告：成都快购科技有限公司。 |
| | 法定代表人：贾弘毅。 |
| | 原告朱先华与被告东海县途果珠宝商行(以下简称途果商行)、被告成都快购科技有限公司(以下简称快购公司)信息网络买卖合同纠纷一案，山东省滕州市人民法院于2021年12月10日立案。 |
| | 朱先华诉称，2021年10月22日在快购公司平台购买银条十根，经鉴定为假银条，于是向快购公司平台客服投诉，快购公司不予受理。朱先华认为，快购公司纵容途果商行销售假冒伪劣产品，应负相关连带责任，并兑现假一赔九的承诺。故诉至法院，请求判令途果商行、快购公司共同赔偿50000元。快购公司在答辩期间提出管辖权异议，认为按照管辖协议约定，本案应由北京互联网法院管辖。 |
| | 山东省滕州市人民法院经审查认为，依据《快手小店用户服务协议》第十一条第2款关于“因快手小店与您就本协议的签订、履行或解释发生争议，各方应努力友好协商解决。如协商不成，任何一方均应向本协议签订地有管辖权的人民法院提起诉讼，本协议签订地为北京市海淀区”约定,本案应由北京互联网法院管辖。2021年12月21日，山东省滕州市人民法院作出(2021)鲁0481民初8872号民事裁定,将本案移送北京互联网法院。北京互联网法院认为移送不当，层报北京市高级人民法院。 |
| | 北京市高级人民法院认为，本案中，朱先华与快购公司系通过网络媒介签订《快手小店用户服务协议》，并无任何相关案件事实与北京市海淀区有关，因此协议管辖条款应认定无效。本案系信息网络买卖合同纠纷，买卖合同双方朱先华与途果商行之间并未就管辖作出任何约定，且《快手小店用户服务协议》本质是网络服务合同，故本案并不适用协议管辖，应当按照法定管辖规则确定管辖法院。涉案合同系通过信息网络方式订立的买卖合同，收货地为朱先华住所地山东省滕州市，故山东省滕州市人民法院对本案有管辖权。 |
| | ．．．．．． |
Dear visitor,you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases . If you are not a subscriber, please subscribe . Should you have any questions, please contact us at:
+86 (10) 8268-9699 or +86 (10) 8266-8266 (ext. 153)
Mobile: +86 133-1157-0713
Fax: +86 (10) 8266-8268
database@chinalawinfo.com
| |
您好：您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区，如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录，进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息；如您还不是我们 的英文用户，请注册并交纳相应费用成为我们的英文会员 。如有问题请来电咨询；
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content
found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright
owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.
Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations
of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language
versions as the final authority. lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly
or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.
We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve
the quality of our materials.
|
|