|
Dandong Colossus Group Co., Ltd. v. Jiangxi Huadian Electricity Co., Ltd. (retrial case regarding dispute over infringement upon trade secrets)
|
|
丹东克隆集团有限责任公司与江西华电电力有限责任公司侵害商业秘密纠纷申请再审案
|
|
【法宝引证码】
|
- Type of Dispute:
IPR--＞Unfair Competition
- Legal document：
Ruling
- Judgment date：
11-27-2015
- Procedural status：
Retrial
|
|
*尊敬的用户，您好！本篇仅为该案例的英文摘要。北大法宝提供单独的翻译服务，如需整篇翻译，请发邮件至database@chinalawinfo.com，或致电86
(10) 8268-9699进行咨询。
*Dear user, this document contains only a summary of the
respective judicial case. To request a full-text translation as an additional service,
please contact us at: + 86 (10) 8268-9699 database@chinalawinfo.com
|
|
|
|
Dandong Colossus Group Co., Ltd. v. Jiangxi Huadian Electricity Co., Ltd. (retrial case regarding dispute over infringement upon trade secrets)
(retrial case regarding dispute over infringement upon trade secrets)
丹东克隆集团有限责任公司与江西华电电力有限责任公司侵害商业秘密纠纷申请再审案
|
|
[Key Terms]
dispute over trade secrets ; capability of adducing evidence ; difficulty of adducing evidence ; objects of rights and obligations
[核心术语]
商业秘密纠纷；举证能力；取证难度；指向对象
|
|
[Disputed Issues]
No people's court may refuse to accept a case just because of the ambiguity of trade secrets and objects of rights and obligations.
[争议焦点]
人民法院不应因商业秘密不明，诉讼权利义务指向不明而不予受理。
|
|
[Case Summary]
According to the provisions in the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China in the trying of a case regarding determination of infringement upon trade secrets...
[案例要旨]
根据《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》的规定在确认不侵害商业秘密纠纷案中应当根据当事人的举证能力和取证难度...
|
Full-text Omitted | | 丹东克隆集团有限责任公司与江西华电电力有限责任公司侵害商业秘密纠纷申请再审案 |
| | 中华人民共和国最高人民法院 |
| | 民事裁定书 |
| | (2015)民申字第628号 |
| | 再审申请人（一审原告、二审被上诉人）：丹东克隆集团有限责任公司。 |
| | 法定代表人：臧克，该公司董事长。 |
| | 委托代理人：周克剑，辽宁凡响律师事务所律师。 |
| | 委托代理人：窦义，辽宁凡响律师事务所律师。 |
| | 被申请人（一审被告、二审上诉人）：江西华电电力有限责任公司。 |
| | 法定代表人：胡达，该公司董事长。 |
| | 委托代理人：辛焕平，北京德恒律师事务所律师。 |
| | 委托代理人：王坤，浙江君安世纪律师事务所律师。 |
| | 再审申请人丹东克隆集团有限责任公司（以下简称丹东克隆）因与被申请人江西华电电力有限责任公司（以下简称江西华电）确认不侵害商业秘密纠纷一案，不服辽宁省高级人民法院（2013）辽民三终字第18号民事裁定，向本院申请再审。本院依法组成合议庭对本案进行了审查，现已审查终结。 |
| | 丹东克隆申请再审称：（一）丹东克隆的商业信誉因江西华电的发送警告函行为而遭受极大损害，丹东克隆生产、销售螺杆膨胀动力机活动已经无法正常进行。（二）本案涉及的螺杆膨胀动力机技术属于公知技术，并非商业秘密。（三）丹东克隆所提起的本案纠纷既符合《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第一百零八条的规定，又符合《最高人民法院关于审理侵犯专利权纠纷案件应用法律若干问题的解释》第十八条的规定。（四）丹东克隆的诉讼请求明确具体，可据此确定本案诉讼权利义务关系所指向的对象。（五）丹东克隆所提起的本案纠纷属于《民事案件案由规定》中的确认不侵害知识产权纠纷范围的案件。（六）本案存在明显的程序违法情形。依据《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第二百条第六项之规定申请再审。 |
| | ．．．．．． |
Dear visitor,you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases . If you are not a subscriber, please subscribe . Should you have any questions, please contact us at:
+86 (10) 8268-9699 or +86 (10) 8266-8266 (ext. 153)
Mobile: +86 133-1157-0713
Fax: +86 (10) 8266-8268
database@chinalawinfo.com
| |
您好：您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区，如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录，进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息；如您还不是我们 的英文用户，请注册并交纳相应费用成为我们的英文会员 。如有问题请来电咨询；
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content
found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright
owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.
Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations
of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language
versions as the final authority. lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly
or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.
We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve
the quality of our materials.
|
|