May 31, 2010
---------------------
Monday
>>>Welcome visitor, you're not logged in.
Login   Subscribe Now!
Home User Management About Us Chinese
  Bookmark   Download   Print
Search:  serch "Fabao" Window Font Size: Home PageHome PageHome Page
 
Kangqin Corp. v. Yan Hong (case regarding dispute over a service contract)—"senior baby nurse" just has a "maternalchild care certificate", Court: Kangqin Company Refunds and Pays Treble Damages Due to Misleading Consumers
康秦公司与严红服务合同纠纷上诉案——“高级育婴师”仅持“母婴护理证” 法院:误导消费存在欺诈退一赔三
【法宝引证码】
  • Legal document: Judgment
  • Procedural status: Trial at Second Instance
 
  
Kangqin Corp. v. Yan Hong (case regarding dispute over a service contract)—"senior baby nurse" just has a "maternalchild care certificate", Court: Kangqin Company Refunds and Pays Treble Damages Due to Misleading Consumers 康秦公司与严红服务合同纠纷上诉案——“高级育婴师”仅持“母婴护理证” 法院:误导消费存在欺诈退一赔三
Recently, the Shanghai No.1 Intermediate People's Court (hereinafter referred to as the “Shanghai No.1 Intermediate Court”) pronounced the judgment on an appeal case of dispute over baby nurse service contract. The court of second instance found that Kangqin Company, as a professional maternal and child service provider, didn't make truthful statements on the qualification of baby nurse at the time of signing the contract and later dispatched a person not qualified as a baby nurse to provide services. Kangqin can be deemed to have committed fraud in signing and performing the contract, and therefore shall bear the punitive liability of "refunding and paying treble damages". 日前,上海市第一中级人民法院(以下简称“上海一中院”)宣判一起涉育婴师服务合同纠纷上诉案,二审认定康秦公司作为专业提供母婴服务的机构,在签订合同时未就育婴师资格等向消费者作如实陈述,此后又委派并不具备育婴师资格的人员提供服务,其在合同订立及履行过程中均存在欺诈行为,应当承担退一赔三的惩罚性赔偿责任。
...... 【案情回放】
 严红生育后为了给宝宝提供更专业的照顾,便与康秦公司签订了《育婴师服务委托协议》,约定由康泰公司为其推荐高级育婴师,提供育婴服务,育婴师必须具有健康证和相关行业资格证书。
 但未曾想,育婴师竟严重失职,婴儿发高烧近40度都没有发现,好在及时送往了医院,否则后果不堪设想。后来,作为合同的签订方,严红诉至法院,称为自己提供服务的育婴师并不具备合同约定的“高级育婴师”资格证书,康秦公司只提供了育婴师的母婴护理资格证,并非国家认定的职业技能鉴定资格证书,故其属于欺诈,应当承担退一赔三的惩罚性赔偿责任。康秦公司则认为“高级育婴师服务”是公司内部的档次划分,属于提供服务中档次较低的那种,仅指育婴服务级别的一个称谓,并非是说育婴师具有高级育婴师的资格证书,所以自己不存在欺诈行为。
 一审法院认为,康秦公司是一个专业的提供母婴护理服务的机构,却以高级育婴师系其公司内部划分作为理由,规避国家对母婴行业服务人员的资质管理要求,显然不符合普通消费者的认知,其主张已提前告知严红,但并未充分举证,法院有理由认定康秦公司在本案中存在欺诈,故对于严红提出的退一赔三的诉讼请求,予以支持。康泰公司不服,向上海一中院提出上诉。
 康秦公司上诉认为,双方在签订协议时已经明确告知严红服务内容和服务项目,高级、特级和VIP级别是针对服务内容,而并非针对育婴师的资格等级,康秦公司不存在欺诈行为。
 ......



Dear visitor,you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases . If you are not a subscriber, please subscribe . Should you have any questions, please contact us at:
+86 (10) 8268-9699 or +86 (10) 8266-8266 (ext. 153)
Mobile: +86 133-1157-0713
Fax: +86 (10) 8266-8268
database@chinalawinfo.com


 


您好:您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区,如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户,请注册并交纳相应费用成为我们的英文会员 。如有问题请来电咨询;
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com


     
     
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝www.lawinfochina.com
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code!
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials.
 
Home | Products and Services | FAQ | Disclaimer | Chinese | Site Map
©2012 Chinalawinfo Co., Ltd.    database@chinalawinfo.com  Tel: +86 (10) 8268-9699  京ICP证010230-8