|
|
|
No. 8 of the Top 10 Intellectual Property Cases Tried by Chinese Courts in 2020 Issued by the Supreme People's Court: Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. and Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. v. Zhejiang Soudao Network Technology Co., Ltd., and Hangzhou Juketong Technology Co., Ltd. — Case of unfair competition dispute related to data rights and interests (case of unfair competition dispute)
|
|
最高人民法院发布2020年中国法院10大知识产权案件之八：深圳市腾讯计算机系统有限公司、腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司与浙江搜道网络技术有限公司、杭州聚客通科技有限公司不正当竞争纠纷案——数据权益不正当竞争纠纷案
|
|
【法宝引证码】
|
- Type of Dispute:
IPR--＞Others
- Legal document：
Judgment
- Procedural status：
Trial at First Instance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| No. 8 of the Top 10 Intellectual Property Cases Tried by Chinese Courts in 2020 Issued by the Supreme People's Court: Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. and Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. v. Zhejiang Soudao Network Technology Co., Ltd., and Hangzhou Juketong Technology Co., Ltd. (case of unfair competition dispute) | | 最高人民法院发布2020年中国法院10大知识产权案件之八：深圳市腾讯计算机系统有限公司、腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司与浙江搜道网络技术有限公司、杭州聚客通科技有限公司不正当竞争纠纷案 |
| — Case of unfair competition dispute related to data rights and interests | | ——数据权益不正当竞争纠纷案 |
| (Civil Judgment No. 1987 [2019], First, Civil, 8601, Zhejiang of the Hangzhou Railway Transportation Court of Zhejiang Province) | | 浙江省杭州铁路运输法院（2019）浙8601民初1987号民事判决书 |
| [Case Summary] Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. and Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Tencent Companies") developed and operated the personal WeChat product to provide consumers with instant social communication service. The data contained in the personal WeChat product mainly included personal identity data and behavioral data such as personal WeChat user account data, friend relationship chain data, and user operation data. The Juketong Group Control Software developed and operated by Zhejiang Soudao Network Technology Co., Ltd., and Hangzhou Juketong Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "two defendants") used the Xposed plug-in technology to add the "personal account" function module of the software to the personal WeChat product for operation, and assisted WeChat users who purchased the software service in commercial marketing and business management activities on the personal WeChat platform. Tencent Companies filed a lawsuit with the Hangzhou Railway Transportation Court of Zhejiang Province, stating that it had data rights and interests in relation to the WeChat platform and that the two defendants committed unfair competition by obtaining and using the case-related data without authorization. The court of first instance held that the network platform party had different data rights and interests in overall data resources and single original data. The two defendants used the alleged infringing software to collect WeChat user data without authorization, and stored the data in a server under their control, not only endangering the data security of WeChat users, but also causing substantial damage to the competitive rights and interests of Tencent Companies based on the overall data resources. The conduct of the two defendants was contrary to business ethics and the relevant provisions of the Cybersecurity Law and constituted unfair competition. The court of first instance entered a judgment that the two defendants should stop the case-related conduct of unfair competition and jointly pay Tencent Companies a total of 2.6 million yuan in compensation for economic loss and reasonable expenses incurred for stoppage of the conduct of unfair competition. | | 【案情摘要】深圳市腾讯计算机系统有限公司、腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司（以下统称腾讯公司）开发运营个人微信产品，为消费者提供即时社交通讯服务。个人微信产品中的数据内容主要为个人微信用户的账号数据、好友关系链数据、用户操作数据等个人身份数据和行为数据。浙江搜道网络技术有限公司、杭州聚客通科技有限公司（以下统称两被告）开发运营的“聚客通群控软件”，利用Xposed外挂技术将该软件中的“个人号”功能模块嵌套于个人微信产品中运行，为购买该软件服务的微信用户在个人微信平台中开展商业营销、商业管理活动提供帮助。腾讯公司向浙江省杭州铁路运输法院提起诉讼，主张其享有微信平台的数据权益，两被告擅自获取、使用涉案数据，构成不正当竞争。一审法院认为，网络平台方对于数据资源整体与单一原始数据个体享有不同的数据权益。两被告通过被控侵权软件擅自收集微信用户数据，存储于自己所控制的服务器内的行为，不仅危及微信用户的数据安全，且对腾讯公司基于数据资源整体获得的竞争权益构成了实质性损害。两被告的行为有违商业道德，且违反了网络安全法的相关规定，构成不正当竞争。一审法院遂判决两被告停止涉案不正当竞争行为，共同赔偿腾讯公司经济损失及为制止不正当竞争行为所支付的合理费用共计260万元。 |
| ．．．．．． | | ．．．．．． |
Dear visitor,you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases . If you are not a subscriber, please subscribe . Should you have any questions, please contact us at:
+86 (10) 8268-9699 or +86 (10) 8266-8266 (ext. 153)
Mobile: +86 133-1157-0713
Fax: +86 (10) 8266-8268
database@chinalawinfo.com
| |
您好：您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区，如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录，进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息；如您还不是我们 的英文用户，请注册并交纳相应费用成为我们的英文会员 。如有问题请来电咨询；
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content
found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright
owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.
Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations
of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language
versions as the final authority. lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly
or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.
We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve
the quality of our materials.
|
|
| |
|
|